A bold new approach to school discipline is being proposed by the government, and it's a move that's sure to spark debate. The core issue? Whether suspended students should be sent home or kept on school premises.
'Retreating to social media' - a concern for the Education Secretary
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has expressed concern that sending suspended pupils home could lead to them retreating into the online world, specifically social media and gaming. She believes this results in a significant loss of learning, and wants to restore suspensions as a serious sanction while keeping students engaged in their education.
The rise in suspensions - a worrying trend
The number of suspensions in England has been on the rise, with a 21% increase between 2022-23 and 2023-24. This trend has accelerated since the Covid pandemic, and the largest percentage rise was seen in primary schools.
On-site suspensions: a potential solution?
The government is suggesting that schools keep suspended pupils on site, rather than sending them home. This approach aims to limit the amount of learning missed by students and provide a structured intervention with meaningful learning and reflection. However, this proposal raises questions about the resources and space available in schools to implement such a strategy.
Who decides? Head teachers take the lead
Head teachers will have the final say on the form suspensions take in their schools. Richard Walkden, head teacher at Ecclesfield Secondary School, sees suspensions as a necessary tool to demonstrate boundaries to students, but acknowledges the harm they can cause, particularly in terms of lost learning.
A controversial interpretation: the impact on vulnerable students
It's important to consider the impact of suspensions on vulnerable students. Pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (Send) and those eligible for free school meals have much higher rates of suspensions and permanent exclusions. This raises questions about the fairness and effectiveness of current disciplinary practices.
The 'framework' for change: a flexible approach
The Department for Education (DfE) plans to consult on a new framework that gives head teachers flexibility. This framework aims to ensure that pupils facing suspension for non-violent behavior continue learning in a separate, supervised setting away from other students. The DfE emphasizes that the most serious and violent behavior will still result in removal from school, with permanent exclusions remaining an option.
Reforming the Send system: a much-needed change?
The government's delayed Schools White Paper will also outline plans to reform the Send system. This reform is welcomed by many, but concerns have been raised about the need for greater investment and specialist support to make these changes effective.
The bigger picture: socio-economic factors and the dangers of exclusion
Steve Chalke, founder of the Oasis Charitable Trust, highlights the potential dangers of sending children home, beyond the use of screens. He argues that socio-economically underserved communities are overrepresented in terms of suspensions, and these children are at risk of falling into violence, danger, and even becoming involved with gangs.
A call for clarity and resources: the perspective of teachers' unions
Teachers' unions have expressed support for the idea of offering helpful clarity to schools, but question how schools will meet expectations without additional funding. The physical space required for internal suspensions is also a concern, as is the need for specialist support to help students understand and address their behavior.
The current landscape: varying approaches to internal suspensions
Existing approaches to internal suspensions and removing pupils from classrooms vary widely. Marianne Lagrue from Coram Children's Legal Centre highlights 'worst case scenarios' where children are kept in isolation for months without formal suspension or exclusion. This practice can be particularly difficult for students with certain types of Send, and raises concerns about the support and stimulation these children receive.
A call to action: your thoughts?
The government's proposal to keep suspended students in school is a bold move, but it's clear that there are many complexities and challenges to consider. What are your thoughts on this issue? Do you think keeping students on site is a better approach, or do you see potential drawbacks? We'd love to hear your opinions in the comments below!
